<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scoville Units Unite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agraham.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agraham.org/blog</link>
	<description>reviews, rants and random chilli ratings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Marah</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-30303</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-30303</guid>
		<description>It is their latest attempt at scaring companies into paying money to them and would be classed as a protection racket if only they had the power to knock a site off Google. The Cowboys don&#039;t have this power, though some of the techniques they use could get a site banned by Google. Techniques such as link farming are designed to &#039;trick&#039; Google into giving a site higher rankings and some big names have fallen fowl of this technique

Marah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is their latest attempt at scaring companies into paying money to them and would be classed as a protection racket if only they had the power to knock a site off Google. The Cowboys don&#8217;t have this power, though some of the techniques they use could get a site banned by Google. Techniques such as link farming are designed to &#8216;trick&#8217; Google into giving a site higher rankings and some big names have fallen fowl of this technique</p>
<p>Marah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by steven walton</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-28089</link>
		<dc:creator>steven walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-28089</guid>
		<description>mmmmmmmmmmmmm........ fell into so many traps here! alwaysbeen a little unsure of this company, gave them the benefit of the doubt tho and they did a decent job. But last year i got a fewphone calls saying i had to pay £300 for something here and there! this happened a few times at each end of the year, like you do when you pre-ocupied working when they ring - paid it. i have recently change my sites to their server! problems are filtering in now, pics dont upload etc and im being told i have to pay £150 per web site for them to sort it?????? like hell i will. they have spoken to me on the phone, but they havent met me in person yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmmmmmmmmmmm&#8230;&#8230;.. fell into so many traps here! alwaysbeen a little unsure of this company, gave them the benefit of the doubt tho and they did a decent job. But last year i got a fewphone calls saying i had to pay £300 for something here and there! this happened a few times at each end of the year, like you do when you pre-ocupied working when they ring &#8211; paid it. i have recently change my sites to their server! problems are filtering in now, pics dont upload etc and im being told i have to pay £150 per web site for them to sort it?????? like hell i will. they have spoken to me on the phone, but they havent met me in person yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Olivia</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-27806</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-27806</guid>
		<description>Last year I was conned into taking a year of being the first hit on google with my chosen 7 phrases for £300, They implied they were from google!!.. Only one of my words turned up on google first page all year! I kept complaining but they do nothing. It seems to be just a scam. I would have taken them to court had I not just had my first baby.
DO NOT USE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year I was conned into taking a year of being the first hit on google with my chosen 7 phrases for £300, They implied they were from google!!.. Only one of my words turned up on google first page all year! I kept complaining but they do nothing. It seems to be just a scam. I would have taken them to court had I not just had my first baby.<br />
DO NOT USE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still No Arguments Against Gay Marriage? by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/12/01/still-no-arguments-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-25808</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=892#comment-25808</guid>
		<description>It is certainly heartening that their ideas are becoming less widespread. Although it is worrying that those who seem the most extreme in their opposition and in their ignorance tend to be from sects which promote having massive families so they may then have a resurgence in the future.

Whilst they are weak and support for gay marriage is strong it is so important to win it so they are then in a position in the future of trying to make a change rather than maintain the current system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly heartening that their ideas are becoming less widespread. Although it is worrying that those who seem the most extreme in their opposition and in their ignorance tend to be from sects which promote having massive families so they may then have a resurgence in the future.</p>
<p>Whilst they are weak and support for gay marriage is strong it is so important to win it so they are then in a position in the future of trying to make a change rather than maintain the current system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still No Arguments Against Gay Marriage? by DarkQ</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/12/01/still-no-arguments-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-25780</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=892#comment-25780</guid>
		<description>I have a gay blog and ofter homophobic people leave some nasty comments in which they express themselves in a way I can&#039;t reproduce. Ignorance and bigotry, mainly found in religious communities, further promotes the idea of homosexuality as a disorder. Many churches may see homosexuality as an act of the devil&#039;s influence or even a demonic possession. However these sects of people are shrinking. Fortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a gay blog and ofter homophobic people leave some nasty comments in which they express themselves in a way I can&#8217;t reproduce. Ignorance and bigotry, mainly found in religious communities, further promotes the idea of homosexuality as a disorder. Many churches may see homosexuality as an act of the devil&#8217;s influence or even a demonic possession. However these sects of people are shrinking. Fortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by stephen</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-25331</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-25331</guid>
		<description>I have had the misfortune in dealing with First Search or Unitel.  They do very little work or very poor quality &amp; standard. Do not use this firm (First Search or Unitel) they have even contacted me from a different office, to sell there services, when I asked if they were the same company as I had given money to &amp; but not done any work, you guessed it no reply same as when I asked about my guaranteed 1st page of Google ad campaign that can not be found no reply. Top tip don&#039;t pay till the work is done, or as we are now a mouthy contract with a small firm that can be cancelled at any time.  BUT DO NOT USE First Search Direct or Unitel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the misfortune in dealing with First Search or Unitel.  They do very little work or very poor quality &amp; standard. Do not use this firm (First Search or Unitel) they have even contacted me from a different office, to sell there services, when I asked if they were the same company as I had given money to &amp; but not done any work, you guessed it no reply same as when I asked about my guaranteed 1st page of Google ad campaign that can not be found no reply. Top tip don&#8217;t pay till the work is done, or as we are now a mouthy contract with a small firm that can be cancelled at any time.  BUT DO NOT USE First Search Direct or Unitel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Still No Arguments Against Gay Marriage? by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The United Homophobes</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/12/01/still-no-arguments-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-21974</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The United Homophobes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=892#comment-21974</guid>
		<description>[...] post yesterday on gay mariage was timely it seems.   Bookmark It              Hide Sites    $$(&#039;div.d903&#039;).each( function(e) { [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post yesterday on gay mariage was timely it seems.   Bookmark It              Hide Sites    $$(&#039;div.d903&#039;).each( function(e) { [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Church Attendance figures by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The United Homophobes</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/01/23/church-attendance-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-21972</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The United Homophobes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=582#comment-21972</guid>
		<description>[...] that Church attendance in England is between 2-3% you would think any significant increase on that would be shouted from the church [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Church attendance in England is between 2-3% you would think any significant increase on that would be shouted from the church [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposition Eight by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Still No Arguments Against Gay Marriage?</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/27/proposition-eight/comment-page-1/#comment-21937</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Still No Arguments Against Gay Marriage?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=394#comment-21937</guid>
		<description>[...] only written a couple of small pieces on this blog about gay marriage, for example around Proposition Eight, but have written scattered pieces around the net for ages on message boards, Facebook walls, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only written a couple of small pieces on this blog about gay marriage, for example around Proposition Eight, but have written scattered pieces around the net for ages on message boards, Facebook walls, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick write up of #DunDDD by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/11/21/quick-write-up-of-dunddd/comment-page-1/#comment-21438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=879#comment-21438</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil, thanks for the info. I had originally written something to send round work and hadn&#039;t modified the &quot;we probably can’t move anything to be using yet&quot; statement. We recently heard of a major client finally moving away from IE6 so are a bit hesitent to be at the bleeding edge!

For anyone not in that situation then yeah go for it - it&#039;s people experimenting with this cool new stuff that didn&#039;t work on every browser at the time that led to loads of the stuff we use every day now. Or of course for people on personal sites to experiment etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil, thanks for the info. I had originally written something to send round work and hadn&#8217;t modified the &#8220;we probably can’t move anything to be using yet&#8221; statement. We recently heard of a major client finally moving away from IE6 so are a bit hesitent to be at the bleeding edge!</p>
<p>For anyone not in that situation then yeah go for it &#8211; it&#8217;s people experimenting with this cool new stuff that didn&#8217;t work on every browser at the time that led to loads of the stuff we use every day now. Or of course for people on personal sites to experiment etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick write up of #DunDDD by Gavin Greig</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/11/21/quick-write-up-of-dunddd/comment-page-1/#comment-21420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Greig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=879#comment-21420</guid>
		<description>[Enormous snip]..., &lt;em&gt;I declare myself king of nerd comedy&lt;/em&gt;

Tsk, you&#039;re supposed to make your claim to be an expert right at the start!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Enormous snip]&#8230;, <em>I declare myself king of nerd comedy</em></p>
<p>Tsk, you&#8217;re supposed to make your claim to be an expert right at the start!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick write up of #DunDDD by Phil Leggetter</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/11/21/quick-write-up-of-dunddd/comment-page-1/#comment-21418</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Leggetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=879#comment-21418</guid>
		<description>Hey Alan,

Thanks for the write-up. Here are few details to answer some questions you&#039;ve hinted at.

&gt; The shopping example on his site was really interesting and might have potential.

You can see this and have a play here: http://realtimewebstore.apphb.com/ The code is available in github too.

&gt; Really looks to be at a prototype stage right now though, especially with it relying on html5 which we probably can’t move anything to be using yet.

WebSockets are most definitely out in the wild and in production. For older browsers there are fallback options with the most common being fallback to Flash using web-socket-js (https://github.com/gimite/web-socket-js) which adds a WebSocket object to the browser runtime if the native object doesn&#039;t exist. Our service (Pusher) is also used by a number of companies in production. You can see a small selection here: http://pusher.com/examples And client include Groupon, SlideShare and MailChimp (sorry for the salesy text, I just wanted to highlight that this stuff is production ready :) ).

&gt; The demo used Websockets which he said there are .Net CLR/Silverlight libraries available for so it might be interesting to play around with them at some point.

Microsoft have an implementation of WebSockets available in .NET 4.0 and Silverlight which Gary used in combination with the Pusher .NET client in his demos:
* http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/prototypes/websockets/websockets/info in combination with the Pusher .NET library which
* http://pusher.com/docs/client_libraries#dotnet

If you&#039;ve any further questions please feed free to drop me an email phil@pusher.com/phil@leggetter.co.uk

Cheers,

Phil @leggetter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alan,</p>
<p>Thanks for the write-up. Here are few details to answer some questions you&#8217;ve hinted at.</p>
<p>&gt; The shopping example on his site was really interesting and might have potential.</p>
<p>You can see this and have a play here: <a href="http://realtimewebstore.apphb.com/" rel="nofollow">http://realtimewebstore.apphb.com/</a> The code is available in github too.</p>
<p>&gt; Really looks to be at a prototype stage right now though, especially with it relying on html5 which we probably can’t move anything to be using yet.</p>
<p>WebSockets are most definitely out in the wild and in production. For older browsers there are fallback options with the most common being fallback to Flash using web-socket-js (<a href="https://github.com/gimite/web-socket-js" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/gimite/web-socket-js</a>) which adds a WebSocket object to the browser runtime if the native object doesn&#8217;t exist. Our service (Pusher) is also used by a number of companies in production. You can see a small selection here: <a href="http://pusher.com/examples" rel="nofollow">http://pusher.com/examples</a> And client include Groupon, SlideShare and MailChimp (sorry for the salesy text, I just wanted to highlight that this stuff is production ready <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>&gt; The demo used Websockets which he said there are .Net CLR/Silverlight libraries available for so it might be interesting to play around with them at some point.</p>
<p>Microsoft have an implementation of WebSockets available in .NET 4.0 and Silverlight which Gary used in combination with the Pusher .NET client in his demos:<br />
* <a href="http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/prototypes/websockets/websockets/info" rel="nofollow">http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/prototypes/websockets/websockets/info</a> in combination with the Pusher .NET library which<br />
* <a href="http://pusher.com/docs/client_libraries#dotnet" rel="nofollow">http://pusher.com/docs/client_libraries#dotnet</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve any further questions please feed free to drop me an email <a href="mailto:phil@pusher.com">phil@pusher.com</a>/phil@leggetter.co.uk</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Phil @leggetter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick write up of #DunDDD by gep13&#039;s Blog &#187; A review of #DunDDD</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/11/21/quick-write-up-of-dunddd/comment-page-1/#comment-21410</link>
		<dc:creator>gep13&#039;s Blog &#187; A review of #DunDDD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=879#comment-21410</guid>
		<description>[...] Quick write up of #DunDDD &#8211; Alan Graham (@Alan_A_Graham) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quick write up of #DunDDD &#8211; Alan Graham (@Alan_A_Graham) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developer Day Scotland #DDDScot by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick write up of #DunDDD</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/05/10/developer-day-scotland-dddscot/comment-page-1/#comment-21409</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quick write up of #DunDDD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=672#comment-21409</guid>
		<description>[...] previously attended DDD Scotland in 2009 and 2010, but didn&#8217;t this year for some reason I don&#8217;t remember. I think it and the 2008 one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously attended DDD Scotland in 2009 and 2010, but didn&#8217;t this year for some reason I don&#8217;t remember. I think it and the 2008 one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Winner is Me! 3 by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Winner is me! 4</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/06/10/a-winner-is-me-3/comment-page-1/#comment-20973</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Winner is me! 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=400#comment-20973</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, it&#8217;s been a while since I posted about winning a competition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, it&#8217;s been a while since I posted about winning a competition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Winner is Me! 3 by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Winner is me! 4</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/06/10/a-winner-is-me-3/comment-page-1/#comment-20974</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Winner is me! 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=400#comment-20974</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, it&#8217;s been a while since I posted about winning a competition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, it&#8217;s been a while since I posted about winning a competition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alice, Alice, who the fuck is Alice? by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/08/01/alice-alice-who-the-fuck-is-alice/comment-page-1/#comment-20972</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=468#comment-20972</guid>
		<description>Wow, I forgot about this post. How right I was about this terrible terrible film</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I forgot about this post. How right I was about this terrible terrible film</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-20411</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-20411</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a comment I wasn&#039;t particularly comfortable publishing. If you wish to assault the people at FSC then please announce so on your own website. If you wish to joke about it, don&#039;t do so on mine. Cheers.

Keep the reviews of this company coming :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a comment I wasn&#8217;t particularly comfortable publishing. If you wish to assault the people at FSC then please announce so on your own website. If you wish to joke about it, don&#8217;t do so on mine. Cheers.</p>
<p>Keep the reviews of this company coming <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Imogen</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-20322</link>
		<dc:creator>Imogen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-20322</guid>
		<description>I have had the misfortune in dealing with First Search or Unitel. when I didn&#039;t want to renew for the 2nd year as I couldn&#039;t see what they had done for £200 they used bullying tactics. I don&#039;t know how they are getting away with it in this day and age. You really really should consider everything that has been said above, I have taken the time to write this as I don&#039;t think they should get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the misfortune in dealing with First Search or Unitel. when I didn&#8217;t want to renew for the 2nd year as I couldn&#8217;t see what they had done for £200 they used bullying tactics. I don&#8217;t know how they are getting away with it in this day and age. You really really should consider everything that has been said above, I have taken the time to write this as I don&#8217;t think they should get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Thomas Arnold</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-18408</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-18408</guid>
		<description>WHAT A BUCH OF CONNING BANDITS.I HAVE NEVER KNOWN A COMPANY LIKE THIS IN MY LIFE,HOW DOES THE MANAGER AND STAFF SLEEP AT NIGHT? 

GOOGLE CANT GUARANTEE 1ST PAGE LISTINGS SO WHY DO THE STAFF KEEP ON CALLING ME SAYING THEY ARE FROM GOOGLE WHEN ALL THEY ARE IS A LITTLE SHITTY COMPANY BASED IN A DINGY OFFICE CONNING PEOPLE LEFT RIGHT AND CENTRE JUST SO THE STAFF CAN LINE THE MANAGERS BANK BALANCE. I WONT NAME MY WEBSITE HERE AS AT THE MOMENT THIS IS GOING THROUGH THE COURTS,TRADING STANDARDS AMONGST OTHER AVENUE&#039;S,LUCKY I DONT PAY HIM A VISIT WITH A FEW CRONIES TO GIVE HIM A GOOD HIDING FOR WHAT HE&#039;S DONE. PLEASE PEOPLE ALL OVER STAY AWAY FROM CHRIS WILKINSON OR ANY OTHER NAKES HE GOES UNDER AT HIS SHAM OF A COMPANY AND HIS COMPANY 1ST SEARCH CONSULTANCY/UNITEL DIRECT OR WHATEVER ITS CALLING IT ITSELF THIS WEEK

BUNCH OF COINNING BANDITS

I BELEIVE IN KARMA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT A BUCH OF CONNING BANDITS.I HAVE NEVER KNOWN A COMPANY LIKE THIS IN MY LIFE,HOW DOES THE MANAGER AND STAFF SLEEP AT NIGHT? </p>
<p>GOOGLE CANT GUARANTEE 1ST PAGE LISTINGS SO WHY DO THE STAFF KEEP ON CALLING ME SAYING THEY ARE FROM GOOGLE WHEN ALL THEY ARE IS A LITTLE SHITTY COMPANY BASED IN A DINGY OFFICE CONNING PEOPLE LEFT RIGHT AND CENTRE JUST SO THE STAFF CAN LINE THE MANAGERS BANK BALANCE. I WONT NAME MY WEBSITE HERE AS AT THE MOMENT THIS IS GOING THROUGH THE COURTS,TRADING STANDARDS AMONGST OTHER AVENUE&#8217;S,LUCKY I DONT PAY HIM A VISIT WITH A FEW CRONIES TO GIVE HIM A GOOD HIDING FOR WHAT HE&#8217;S DONE. PLEASE PEOPLE ALL OVER STAY AWAY FROM CHRIS WILKINSON OR ANY OTHER NAKES HE GOES UNDER AT HIS SHAM OF A COMPANY AND HIS COMPANY 1ST SEARCH CONSULTANCY/UNITEL DIRECT OR WHATEVER ITS CALLING IT ITSELF THIS WEEK</p>
<p>BUNCH OF COINNING BANDITS</p>
<p>I BELEIVE IN KARMA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-social media by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/08/02/anti-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-17349</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=845#comment-17349</guid>
		<description>Yeah Google+ merges together the best privacy/sharing bits of the other services but doesn&#039;t really add much extra. At least for me.

I&#039;ve heard people rave about the hangout stuff, and if you have lots of other google stuff that will all integrate well - Gennas picassa groups pulled in to google+ look really good. The only other google eco-system I use are analytics, webmaster tools and groups though so it doesn&#039;t have those benefits for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Google+ merges together the best privacy/sharing bits of the other services but doesn&#8217;t really add much extra. At least for me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard people rave about the hangout stuff, and if you have lots of other google stuff that will all integrate well &#8211; Gennas picassa groups pulled in to google+ look really good. The only other google eco-system I use are analytics, webmaster tools and groups though so it doesn&#8217;t have those benefits for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-social media by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/08/02/anti-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-17348</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=845#comment-17348</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can only post to a group subset&quot; - I wondered why I rarely see updates from you anymore on FB!

Facebook: highest privacy but could easily cull the friends list.

Twitter: free-for-all, have had it private before but find it more entertaining public, not that I post much of interest.

Google+: tumbleweed, though I like the circles idea - unfortunately it&#039;s pretty much useless unless everyone migrates over from FB. I think there was good reason for the migration from Bebo/MySpace to FB, but as G+ is so similar can anyone really be bothered moving their entire social life over when the two sites are ultimately pretty similar?

Flickr: free-for-all - pointless otherwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can only post to a group subset&#8221; &#8211; I wondered why I rarely see updates from you anymore on FB!</p>
<p>Facebook: highest privacy but could easily cull the friends list.</p>
<p>Twitter: free-for-all, have had it private before but find it more entertaining public, not that I post much of interest.</p>
<p>Google+: tumbleweed, though I like the circles idea &#8211; unfortunately it&#8217;s pretty much useless unless everyone migrates over from FB. I think there was good reason for the migration from Bebo/MySpace to FB, but as G+ is so similar can anyone really be bothered moving their entire social life over when the two sites are ultimately pretty similar?</p>
<p>Flickr: free-for-all &#8211; pointless otherwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Beware the adwords cowboys &#124; Effective Website Design - Website Assessments</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-16086</link>
		<dc:creator>Beware the adwords cowboys &#124; Effective Website Design - Website Assessments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-16086</guid>
		<description>[...] Search Consultancy - Blog post -  Blagger and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search Consultancy &#8211; Blog post -  Blagger and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy send in the lawyers by Mia</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/01/21/first-search-consultancy-send-in-the-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-14637</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=579#comment-14637</guid>
		<description>I too was cold-called by First Search aka Unitel Direct, and succumbed to their incredibly devious, accelerated patter, including insisting I must pay upfront (stupid stupid fell for it. How do they sleep?)

 They &#039;designed&#039; hah! me a website - i.e. I spent several gruelling months training the er &#039;designer&#039; how to do it. There were inumerable delays and obfuscations, finally it went live on Dec 1, 2010.
 6 months later, having not received one single email enquiry from the contacts page, I discover through Statcounter, that hundreds of people had visited the site and many had tried to get in contact. Another few gruelling weeks communication with Unitel later, it appears at last to be working, but of course Unitel, won&#039;t offer compensation for the loss of potentially tens of thousands of £s worth of work and refuse to take any blame. Dealings with Unitel are frustrating, Kafkaesque - your sanity is at risk, let alone your pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was cold-called by First Search aka Unitel Direct, and succumbed to their incredibly devious, accelerated patter, including insisting I must pay upfront (stupid stupid fell for it. How do they sleep?)</p>
<p> They &#8216;designed&#8217; hah! me a website &#8211; i.e. I spent several gruelling months training the er &#8216;designer&#8217; how to do it. There were inumerable delays and obfuscations, finally it went live on Dec 1, 2010.<br />
 6 months later, having not received one single email enquiry from the contacts page, I discover through Statcounter, that hundreds of people had visited the site and many had tried to get in contact. Another few gruelling weeks communication with Unitel later, it appears at last to be working, but of course Unitel, won&#8217;t offer compensation for the loss of potentially tens of thousands of £s worth of work and refuse to take any blame. Dealings with Unitel are frustrating, Kafkaesque &#8211; your sanity is at risk, let alone your pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Insight Magazine running a scam? by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/10/18/are-insight-magazine-running-a-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-14343</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 07:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=750#comment-14343</guid>
		<description>Hi Jessy, so sorry to hear that you got stung by them as well :(.

Glad your Trading Standards were so helpful and that they pointed you here to confirm your suspicions means they must have heard of them before. The sheer number of hits this post gets on my wee blog is both amazing and scary.

Good luck with your dispute. if enough people dispute charges against a company their credit rating with the clearing bank gets hammered, and they very quickly find it very difficult to operate.

For anyone else who hears of a story that seems too good to be true, search for &quot;&lt;company name&gt; scam&quot;. If loads of hits and stories come up then beware! If none come up it could still mean they have only just started using that name so still search around for similar deals to see if it is known to be dodgy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jessy, so sorry to hear that you got stung by them as well <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Glad your Trading Standards were so helpful and that they pointed you here to confirm your suspicions means they must have heard of them before. The sheer number of hits this post gets on my wee blog is both amazing and scary.</p>
<p>Good luck with your dispute. if enough people dispute charges against a company their credit rating with the clearing bank gets hammered, and they very quickly find it very difficult to operate.</p>
<p>For anyone else who hears of a story that seems too good to be true, search for &#8220;<company name> scam&#8221;. If loads of hits and stories come up then beware! If none come up it could still mean they have only just started using that name so still search around for similar deals to see if it is known to be dodgy.</company></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Insight Magazine running a scam? by Jessy Jock</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/10/18/are-insight-magazine-running-a-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-14334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessy Jock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 21:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=750#comment-14334</guid>
		<description>Hi
My local trading standards officer pointed out this blog post when I contacted them with regards &quot;Insight magazine LTD&quot;
I am lucky that my local trading standards were so helpful and provided such good advice regarding this company and their practices, in fact I drew tears in thanking them for their help.
It is a really bad sick feeling when you realise that you have been a victim of a scam or theft of money or property. In the case of this company its more than just that as the sales technique is so personal and convincing, I cannot understand how the sales director or anyone associated or employed with this company can sleep at night, praying on small businesses, shame on you!.
Insight magazine seems to pray on small businesses exibiting at up and coming events at the NEC Birmingham. Also by the look of there magazine online they also target other smaller exhibitions in the area also. 
According to their website at the time of writing (which I have forwarded screen shots to trading standards and also my lawer) 
Distribution  
 Insight Magazine is available throughout carefully selected distribution points including the Arcadian Centre, Jewellery Quarter, Brindley Place, Mailbox, New Street, Rep Bar, different apartment blocks including Heritage Court, Liberty Place, King Edwards Warf, Millennium. Insight is also available in a selection of Fitness Centres, Golf Clubs &amp; Top Hotels not to mention Birmingham Children’s Hospital, National Express, NEC information points, NEC Train Station and various hotels on the NEC complex. Picking up a lot of extra coverage at the Birmingham Airport Hotels we are backed by the copies throughout Asda, Morrisons, Sainsburys, Tesco and Makro.

Using Self Select Distribution to hit the supermarkets and Media Matters for all other drops we have been able to generate not only a fantastic readership of over 15,000 on the back of a 5,000 print run but a vast range of particularly successful regular advertisers.

We specialise in producing local and national features which we know will be of great interest to our now established readership. Only promoting quality companies alongside general editorials.

Many of the magazines are predominately promoted in our very own points of sale units.
  
 
I called the NEC in Birminham twice today, 1st call I spoke to someone in the office, they said they have definately never heard of this publication before and to date have never distributed it, to add they said that they distribute &quot;inside magazine&quot; and also &quot; whats on&quot;. The second call I asked to speak to someone at an information point within the NEC, they said the same. Both conversations I have recorded. 

Thats the 1st add, the second add I never did agree too. They sent the confirmation and the proof, I, at that stage I agreed to nothing. They have all their bases covered it seems, the date it had to be approved by was hours before I  recieved this, the subsequent hours of my precious time were filled with her relentlessly calling me and my staff to try to get a 3rd add, we had won an award ect. With this I was filled with rage and did not say anything on the phone or otherwise other than phone back later. They are now claiming that it doesnt matter if I confirmed or not its within their terms and conditions that not replying means that you accept. They put an add proof together literally minutes after I hung up the phone, I emailed back with not accepted, not aproved not confirmed ect. They emailed me back telling me as per what you have said above to ask the FBS, Ask the flipping FBS? ok so are they gonna tell me that you are in the right and me in the wrong I flipping think not! Also they told me that if I did not aggree that they would print 2 pages blank in the &quot;magazine&quot;... hmm
I at one stage after the first add that I stupidly aggreed to, they took the payment for the second... I had no clue that they had taken the payment for this its outrageous. I am disputing this with my credit card company at present. 
The random threats of we will take this further, I am actually quite prepaired and would welcome them to take me to court, If I do not take action first that is. I hope that they like haggis? as I am told by TS that the case would have to take place here in Scotland and by Scottish law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
My local trading standards officer pointed out this blog post when I contacted them with regards &#8220;Insight magazine LTD&#8221;<br />
I am lucky that my local trading standards were so helpful and provided such good advice regarding this company and their practices, in fact I drew tears in thanking them for their help.<br />
It is a really bad sick feeling when you realise that you have been a victim of a scam or theft of money or property. In the case of this company its more than just that as the sales technique is so personal and convincing, I cannot understand how the sales director or anyone associated or employed with this company can sleep at night, praying on small businesses, shame on you!.<br />
Insight magazine seems to pray on small businesses exibiting at up and coming events at the NEC Birmingham. Also by the look of there magazine online they also target other smaller exhibitions in the area also.<br />
According to their website at the time of writing (which I have forwarded screen shots to trading standards and also my lawer)<br />
Distribution<br />
 Insight Magazine is available throughout carefully selected distribution points including the Arcadian Centre, Jewellery Quarter, Brindley Place, Mailbox, New Street, Rep Bar, different apartment blocks including Heritage Court, Liberty Place, King Edwards Warf, Millennium. Insight is also available in a selection of Fitness Centres, Golf Clubs &amp; Top Hotels not to mention Birmingham Children’s Hospital, National Express, NEC information points, NEC Train Station and various hotels on the NEC complex. Picking up a lot of extra coverage at the Birmingham Airport Hotels we are backed by the copies throughout Asda, Morrisons, Sainsburys, Tesco and Makro.</p>
<p>Using Self Select Distribution to hit the supermarkets and Media Matters for all other drops we have been able to generate not only a fantastic readership of over 15,000 on the back of a 5,000 print run but a vast range of particularly successful regular advertisers.</p>
<p>We specialise in producing local and national features which we know will be of great interest to our now established readership. Only promoting quality companies alongside general editorials.</p>
<p>Many of the magazines are predominately promoted in our very own points of sale units.</p>
<p>I called the NEC in Birminham twice today, 1st call I spoke to someone in the office, they said they have definately never heard of this publication before and to date have never distributed it, to add they said that they distribute &#8220;inside magazine&#8221; and also &#8221; whats on&#8221;. The second call I asked to speak to someone at an information point within the NEC, they said the same. Both conversations I have recorded. </p>
<p>Thats the 1st add, the second add I never did agree too. They sent the confirmation and the proof, I, at that stage I agreed to nothing. They have all their bases covered it seems, the date it had to be approved by was hours before I  recieved this, the subsequent hours of my precious time were filled with her relentlessly calling me and my staff to try to get a 3rd add, we had won an award ect. With this I was filled with rage and did not say anything on the phone or otherwise other than phone back later. They are now claiming that it doesnt matter if I confirmed or not its within their terms and conditions that not replying means that you accept. They put an add proof together literally minutes after I hung up the phone, I emailed back with not accepted, not aproved not confirmed ect. They emailed me back telling me as per what you have said above to ask the FBS, Ask the flipping FBS? ok so are they gonna tell me that you are in the right and me in the wrong I flipping think not! Also they told me that if I did not aggree that they would print 2 pages blank in the &#8220;magazine&#8221;&#8230; hmm<br />
I at one stage after the first add that I stupidly aggreed to, they took the payment for the second&#8230; I had no clue that they had taken the payment for this its outrageous. I am disputing this with my credit card company at present.<br />
The random threats of we will take this further, I am actually quite prepaired and would welcome them to take me to court, If I do not take action first that is. I hope that they like haggis? as I am told by TS that the case would have to take place here in Scotland and by Scottish law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elvis has left the building by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/03/21/elvis-has-left-the-building/comment-page-1/#comment-12263</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=809#comment-12263</guid>
		<description>DNDEE_ML

I&#039;m sure 400 had a category assigned to it but can&#039;t remember what for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNDEE_ML</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure 400 had a category assigned to it but can&#8217;t remember what for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elvis has left the building by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/03/21/elvis-has-left-the-building/comment-page-1/#comment-12245</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=809#comment-12245</guid>
		<description>Cheers Kenny, will update post with that later. I figured even the wrong numbers would illustrate the kind of system used to non-Virgin employees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Kenny, will update post with that later. I figured even the wrong numbers would illustrate the kind of system used to non-Virgin employees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elvis has left the building by kenny g</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/03/21/elvis-has-left-the-building/comment-page-1/#comment-12244</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=809#comment-12244</guid>
		<description>100 Albums
200 Film
300 Games
500 Accessories
700 Singles
800 Books
900 Generic Skus plus Virgin Mobile

My Elvis sign on was DNDEE_KG and my password was always ACETONE follwed by a number 1 to 8 as Elvis logged your last eight passwords to stop you using the same ones. The generic login was DNDEE_ENQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100 Albums<br />
200 Film<br />
300 Games<br />
500 Accessories<br />
700 Singles<br />
800 Books<br />
900 Generic Skus plus Virgin Mobile</p>
<p>My Elvis sign on was DNDEE_KG and my password was always ACETONE follwed by a number 1 to 8 as Elvis logged your last eight passwords to stop you using the same ones. The generic login was DNDEE_ENQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elvis has left the building by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/03/21/elvis-has-left-the-building/comment-page-1/#comment-12217</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=809#comment-12217</guid>
		<description>I really struggled remembering some info to put in and as I wasn&#039;t sure I left out.

100 albums
200 singles
300 film
700 game
800 book
or something, I used to know loads of the sub categories too.

Was the logon DNDEE_AG 8 characters and 6 character passwords for the systems? And the store was 422 or 442, I think 422.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really struggled remembering some info to put in and as I wasn&#8217;t sure I left out.</p>
<p>100 albums<br />
200 singles<br />
300 film<br />
700 game<br />
800 book<br />
or something, I used to know loads of the sub categories too.</p>
<p>Was the logon DNDEE_AG 8 characters and 6 character passwords for the systems? And the store was 422 or 442, I think 422.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elvis has left the building by Col</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2011/03/21/elvis-has-left-the-building/comment-page-1/#comment-12215</link>
		<dc:creator>Col</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=809#comment-12215</guid>
		<description>Cheers for bringing back my nightmares Alan. hahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for bringing back my nightmares Alan. hahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy Scam by Einar</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/08/23/first-search-consultancy-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-10119</link>
		<dc:creator>Einar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=741#comment-10119</guid>
		<description>I have been ripped off by these cowboys as well and they are phoning me again and agian trying to get more money out off me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been ripped off by these cowboys as well and they are phoning me again and agian trying to get more money out off me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Dave</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-9846</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-9846</guid>
		<description>I am just in the process of taking legal action against Unitel Direct or first search consultancy as I later discovered, via my credit card company as they sold me a load of keywords over the telephone and a guaranteed first position in Google, Bing, Yahoo,  for seven keywords of my choosing. 

They optimised my website with different keywords than I specified over the telephone and removed a lot of local areas from my keywords that I considered very relevant to my business without my consent.

I am now worse of than I was before in terms of google ranking thanks to them removing areas from from keywords.

I have also just spend over a full day preparing a very lengthy case against them printing emails off and documenting my dealings with this company from start to finish all in the hope that I get my £250+VAT back.

My advise to anyone considering using them is don&#039;t they should be avoided like the plague.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just in the process of taking legal action against Unitel Direct or first search consultancy as I later discovered, via my credit card company as they sold me a load of keywords over the telephone and a guaranteed first position in Google, Bing, Yahoo,  for seven keywords of my choosing. </p>
<p>They optimised my website with different keywords than I specified over the telephone and removed a lot of local areas from my keywords that I considered very relevant to my business without my consent.</p>
<p>I am now worse of than I was before in terms of google ranking thanks to them removing areas from from keywords.</p>
<p>I have also just spend over a full day preparing a very lengthy case against them printing emails off and documenting my dealings with this company from start to finish all in the hope that I get my £250+VAT back.</p>
<p>My advise to anyone considering using them is don&#8217;t they should be avoided like the plague.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Beware the adwords cowboys &#124; EWD</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-9786</link>
		<dc:creator>Beware the adwords cowboys &#124; EWD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-9786</guid>
		<description>[...] Search Consultancy - Blog post -  Blagger  &#171; How to avoid the SEO link building scam What&#8217;s wrong with Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search Consultancy &#8211; Blog post -  Blagger  &laquo; How to avoid the SEO link building scam What&#8217;s wrong with Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Bella</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-8461</link>
		<dc:creator>Bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-8461</guid>
		<description>Dear All

Reading the above comments, I am also compelled to write about my experience with the said company.

All beware, if you have any dealings with this company you may have the same results as myself.  Stress from not being able to talk to anybody and when making a complaint having to wait 36 hours for a non-existent call back. No one in authority is ever available to take your call.  They con you out of your money by promising fantastic results from ALL your chosen key words which also never materialises.  In my case they did not provide a copy of the terms and conditions until after I had paid.  In the T&amp;C you will see that their sales statement of &#039;All keys words&#039; working for page one listing changes to &#039;up to 7&#039; which in fact means just ONE. When you want to cancel your contract with them you have to give them your pass codes to access your site to &quot;remove their work&quot; and if you do not they will &#039;take you to court&#039; if you do not pay for another year. (the following is an extract from an email received from them) &quot; Failure to pay the renewal invoice within 14 days of receiving this then the account with become a bad debtor which may or be passed onto a 3rd party collection agency to retrieve the monies owed&quot; After they had &#039;removed their work&#039; I had to spend hours fixing my site.

Just as a comparison, my second site which I SEO&#039;d myself is far more successful than the site they did.

I cannot with any conscience recommend this company and would suggest to anybody considering using their services...think very carefully!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear All</p>
<p>Reading the above comments, I am also compelled to write about my experience with the said company.</p>
<p>All beware, if you have any dealings with this company you may have the same results as myself.  Stress from not being able to talk to anybody and when making a complaint having to wait 36 hours for a non-existent call back. No one in authority is ever available to take your call.  They con you out of your money by promising fantastic results from ALL your chosen key words which also never materialises.  In my case they did not provide a copy of the terms and conditions until after I had paid.  In the T&amp;C you will see that their sales statement of &#8216;All keys words&#8217; working for page one listing changes to &#8216;up to 7&#8242; which in fact means just ONE. When you want to cancel your contract with them you have to give them your pass codes to access your site to &#8220;remove their work&#8221; and if you do not they will &#8216;take you to court&#8217; if you do not pay for another year. (the following is an extract from an email received from them) &#8221; Failure to pay the renewal invoice within 14 days of receiving this then the account with become a bad debtor which may or be passed onto a 3rd party collection agency to retrieve the monies owed&#8221; After they had &#8216;removed their work&#8217; I had to spend hours fixing my site.</p>
<p>Just as a comparison, my second site which I SEO&#8217;d myself is far more successful than the site they did.</p>
<p>I cannot with any conscience recommend this company and would suggest to anybody considering using their services&#8230;think very carefully!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Richard Thomson</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-8197</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-8197</guid>
		<description>First Search Consultancy are thieves and cowboys, liars and scam artists. If you read through their terms and conditions, which if you are for some strange reason considering, you will find that they not only don&#039;t have to provide results but can charge you for not getting them! If they decide that your updating of your site harms your listing in Google or whomever then they can and will charge for &quot;fixing&quot; your site. As for me, we paid £1000 and were promised first page positions for 14 keywords within the UK and European listings. I had their promise clarified several times that all 14 would have us on page one of Google and they said every one. Out of all of these there are only 4 keywords where we are on page one and then only in the UK. After several months of complaining I am no further forward and now just want my money back. Will try suing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Search Consultancy are thieves and cowboys, liars and scam artists. If you read through their terms and conditions, which if you are for some strange reason considering, you will find that they not only don&#8217;t have to provide results but can charge you for not getting them! If they decide that your updating of your site harms your listing in Google or whomever then they can and will charge for &#8220;fixing&#8221; your site. As for me, we paid £1000 and were promised first page positions for 14 keywords within the UK and European listings. I had their promise clarified several times that all 14 would have us on page one of Google and they said every one. Out of all of these there are only 4 keywords where we are on page one and then only in the UK. After several months of complaining I am no further forward and now just want my money back. Will try suing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy Scam by Richard</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/08/23/first-search-consultancy-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-8195</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=741#comment-8195</guid>
		<description>First Search Consultancy Scam - SEO Scam - Cowboys - Misselling SEO - Misleading Sales

I have been ripped off by these cowboys First Search Consultancy and their customer service are most unhelpful, nor do they even try and offer a solution.

Has anyone ever successfully had their money returned? Or as it is a service that they offer - have you been able to get the work done properly by another company and First Search Consultancy pay for this?

I would love to hear from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Search Consultancy Scam &#8211; SEO Scam &#8211; Cowboys &#8211; Misselling SEO &#8211; Misleading Sales</p>
<p>I have been ripped off by these cowboys First Search Consultancy and their customer service are most unhelpful, nor do they even try and offer a solution.</p>
<p>Has anyone ever successfully had their money returned? Or as it is a service that they offer &#8211; have you been able to get the work done properly by another company and First Search Consultancy pay for this?</p>
<p>I would love to hear from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-8142</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-8142</guid>
		<description>You are right to be wary. Even according to Google no-one can guarantee first page ranking http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35291

Anyone claiming such is either using underhand techniques to get your money or underhand techniques to get you ranking higher. When Google are happy to drop BMW from rankings (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4685750.stm) for black-hat SEO stuff why would they hesitate with you or anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right to be wary. Even according to Google no-one can guarantee first page ranking <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=35291" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=35291</a></p>
<p>Anyone claiming such is either using underhand techniques to get your money or underhand techniques to get you ranking higher. When Google are happy to drop BMW from rankings (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4685750.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4685750.stm</a>) for black-hat SEO stuff why would they hesitate with you or anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Guy</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-8141</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-8141</guid>
		<description>I have just got off the phone to unitel direct which is also first search.
They have offered me 1st page on google within 4 weeks at the most
They have offered to split the payments of £250 plus vat into two payments over two months.
They said i will not have to pay the second payment until the work is completed and i see results on google.
According to them there is no obscure search phrase, they have emailed a breakdown of what they will do.
They sound genuine, but reading the comments on this site i am not so sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just got off the phone to unitel direct which is also first search.<br />
They have offered me 1st page on google within 4 weeks at the most<br />
They have offered to split the payments of £250 plus vat into two payments over two months.<br />
They said i will not have to pay the second payment until the work is completed and i see results on google.<br />
According to them there is no obscure search phrase, they have emailed a breakdown of what they will do.<br />
They sound genuine, but reading the comments on this site i am not so sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Insight Magazine running a scam? by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/10/18/are-insight-magazine-running-a-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-7781</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=750#comment-7781</guid>
		<description>Hi
I have just read your blog and thought you might be interested to know that I have had the same problem with Insight Magazine. I have taken advice from consumer direct and am taking legal action against them. They are breaking the supply of goods and services act 1982, and are also missrepresenting at point of sale regarding their distribution. therefore in breech of contract.
It would be well worth you persuing the matter further. Trading standards have also been in contact with me and are looking into them.
If you want to get in touch feel free, lets make sure they don&#039;t get away with it anymore!1

Good luck

Michelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I have just read your blog and thought you might be interested to know that I have had the same problem with Insight Magazine. I have taken advice from consumer direct and am taking legal action against them. They are breaking the supply of goods and services act 1982, and are also missrepresenting at point of sale regarding their distribution. therefore in breech of contract.<br />
It would be well worth you persuing the matter further. Trading standards have also been in contact with me and are looking into them.<br />
If you want to get in touch feel free, lets make sure they don&#8217;t get away with it anymore!1</p>
<p>Good luck</p>
<p>Michelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Ben</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-6461</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-6461</guid>
		<description>Was contacted by a company called Unitel, on a Google search it says it incorporates a company I think we are talking about. They informed me that my current SEO, another bunch of cowboys, as they have folded. One thing though I did reach first page on google search as promised by my former SEO. Anyway they wanted to charge me £200 to keep first page status. They were trying to pressure sell. I did not fold. Keep away from this lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was contacted by a company called Unitel, on a Google search it says it incorporates a company I think we are talking about. They informed me that my current SEO, another bunch of cowboys, as they have folded. One thing though I did reach first page on google search as promised by my former SEO. Anyway they wanted to charge me £200 to keep first page status. They were trying to pressure sell. I did not fold. Keep away from this lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Peter Kelly</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-6015</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-6015</guid>
		<description>Same old story for me: Not enough time myself to do any SEO so thought they were reasonable.
However, they said they would optimize my site, but then created that single page redirect nonsense, which has their name first in the address. Clearly, that is the only part to get results as they must be relying on it being a page of a vast website, so to speak. It is NOT what they sell though.
However, after endless complaints, they did some work on my site and amazingly it worked!
Unfortunately, they optimized for Sunderland, even though I live in Merseyside!!!!
When I told them this they denied doing anything and said it must have been me!!!!!!!!
So, on the one hand they told me they had optimized my site, then they told me they hadn&#039;t done any work, despite my paying for it...
They can&#039;t even get their own stories right. AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old story for me: Not enough time myself to do any SEO so thought they were reasonable.<br />
However, they said they would optimize my site, but then created that single page redirect nonsense, which has their name first in the address. Clearly, that is the only part to get results as they must be relying on it being a page of a vast website, so to speak. It is NOT what they sell though.<br />
However, after endless complaints, they did some work on my site and amazingly it worked!<br />
Unfortunately, they optimized for Sunderland, even though I live in Merseyside!!!!<br />
When I told them this they denied doing anything and said it must have been me!!!!!!!!<br />
So, on the one hand they told me they had optimized my site, then they told me they hadn&#8217;t done any work, despite my paying for it&#8230;<br />
They can&#8217;t even get their own stories right. AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Steve</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>Hi I was contacted by First Serach as I have a website. Thay charged me a lot of money. And did a very poor job of the SEO work on my website. Thay are a load of Cowboys. Good sale&#039;s man with lot&#039;s of Chat. Thay say thay will do so much for you and then Rip you Off. Then keep on calling you to pay out more Money.
Tell then to Fuck Off. COWBOY&#039;S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I was contacted by First Serach as I have a website. Thay charged me a lot of money. And did a very poor job of the SEO work on my website. Thay are a load of Cowboys. Good sale&#8217;s man with lot&#8217;s of Chat. Thay say thay will do so much for you and then Rip you Off. Then keep on calling you to pay out more Money.<br />
Tell then to Fuck Off. COWBOY&#8217;S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Dennis C</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5947</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5947</guid>
		<description>Yes they were Shite at everything. No customer service, and totally clueless in design. They tried to rip me off for hosting, but I one the battle to get a better deal for myself. But stear well clear of them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they were Shite at everything. No customer service, and totally clueless in design. They tried to rip me off for hosting, but I one the battle to get a better deal for myself. But stear well clear of them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Glen</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5866</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 07:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5866</guid>
		<description>I have been completely ripped off by these scammers! I paid £1000.00 upfont for a 7 page website -  they took the full amount from my card despite saying they take half upfront and half on delivery of the site. I explained that, being a photographer, image and design were of paramount importance. I sent in graphics which I wanted including on my site, I sent in examples of other sites which I wanted mine modelled on and what they eventually delivered was a one page splash page which was an insult to my intelligence, an insult to web design and ultimately damaging to my business. I looked like it had been design by a blind 5 year old child and was so bad that I got them to take it down! I asked for my money back and they refused saying they had fulfilled their obligations to me as it did come up on page one of google, but under their name &#039;first search consultancy&#039;. Does anyone have any advice about how I can get my money back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been completely ripped off by these scammers! I paid £1000.00 upfont for a 7 page website &#8211;  they took the full amount from my card despite saying they take half upfront and half on delivery of the site. I explained that, being a photographer, image and design were of paramount importance. I sent in graphics which I wanted including on my site, I sent in examples of other sites which I wanted mine modelled on and what they eventually delivered was a one page splash page which was an insult to my intelligence, an insult to web design and ultimately damaging to my business. I looked like it had been design by a blind 5 year old child and was so bad that I got them to take it down! I asked for my money back and they refused saying they had fulfilled their obligations to me as it did come up on page one of google, but under their name &#8216;first search consultancy&#8217;. Does anyone have any advice about how I can get my money back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5779</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5779</guid>
		<description>What you&#039;ll get is charged a lot to post some ads on google which you can do yourself you will not get 1st page on google for any useful queries regarding your jewellery from their &quot;help&quot;. They&#039;ll also dump loads of keywords at the top and bottom of your page which will help in the short term but looks bad and will put off visitors. Post your story here too as Ronan has a larger collection of his type http://www.ronanobrien.info/selling-first-place-on-google-scam/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;ll get is charged a lot to post some ads on google which you can do yourself you will not get 1st page on google for any useful queries regarding your jewellery from their &#8220;help&#8221;. They&#8217;ll also dump loads of keywords at the top and bottom of your page which will help in the short term but looks bad and will put off visitors. Post your story here too as Ronan has a larger collection of his type <a href="http://www.ronanobrien.info/selling-first-place-on-google-scam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ronanobrien.info/selling-first-place-on-google-scam/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Jo</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5777</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone,

have just paid out to use this company for my new website.  After reading what you have written - I don&#039;t know what to do, they are working behind the scenes now.  I was told that I would get 1st page position.  Any advice?  It would be much appreciated!

Jo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>have just paid out to use this company for my new website.  After reading what you have written &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what to do, they are working behind the scenes now.  I was told that I would get 1st page position.  Any advice?  It would be much appreciated!</p>
<p>Jo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by annonymous</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>annonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>I recently had them call asking odd questions such as my full name and address without actually offering a service at all... obviously i didnt but kept them talking... it was quite clear they were looking for personal info.
I did a bit of research and found that a local rival company uses them to optimize his site.
I can only imagine they wanted to gain access to my website (since it sits above his) to sabotage it.
Really shady company.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had them call asking odd questions such as my full name and address without actually offering a service at all&#8230; obviously i didnt but kept them talking&#8230; it was quite clear they were looking for personal info.<br />
I did a bit of research and found that a local rival company uses them to optimize his site.<br />
I can only imagine they wanted to gain access to my website (since it sits above his) to sabotage it.<br />
Really shady company&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by nick</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5538</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5538</guid>
		<description>SUE THEM AND GET YOUR MONEY BACK - I DID - THEY DIDNT EVEN TURN UP
i bought into their sales crap about a year ago, their customer service is crap, the company is crap and the service they try to provide is equally so

STAY WELL AWAY FROM THIS COMPANY - BUT IF YOU BOUGHT. . .

i just sued them to get my money back as they didnt achieve the page one rankings promised. i went to court and they didnt even turn up so i got a couple of hundred pounds more because of court costs etc

they couldnt even pay me on the right day though so i just had to call them again, the flunky on the desk couldnt or wouldnt put me through to accounts and the management is to cowardly to come to the phone

MORAL OF THE STORY - STAY AS FAR AWAY AS YOU CAN FROM THIS COMPANY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUE THEM AND GET YOUR MONEY BACK &#8211; I DID &#8211; THEY DIDNT EVEN TURN UP<br />
i bought into their sales crap about a year ago, their customer service is crap, the company is crap and the service they try to provide is equally so</p>
<p>STAY WELL AWAY FROM THIS COMPANY &#8211; BUT IF YOU BOUGHT. . .</p>
<p>i just sued them to get my money back as they didnt achieve the page one rankings promised. i went to court and they didnt even turn up so i got a couple of hundred pounds more because of court costs etc</p>
<p>they couldnt even pay me on the right day though so i just had to call them again, the flunky on the desk couldnt or wouldnt put me through to accounts and the management is to cowardly to come to the phone</p>
<p>MORAL OF THE STORY &#8211; STAY AS FAR AWAY AS YOU CAN FROM THIS COMPANY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by webmaster</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>First Search Consultancy contacted one of our clients and totally mis sold their &quot;Services&quot; to him. Stay well away, I know how to SEO a web site and what they offer is a joke, their design skills are woefully inadequate, just dont go there, they are also part of Unitel Direct, so bodyswerve them too if you dont want to be ripped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Search Consultancy contacted one of our clients and totally mis sold their &#8220;Services&#8221; to him. Stay well away, I know how to SEO a web site and what they offer is a joke, their design skills are woefully inadequate, just dont go there, they are also part of Unitel Direct, so bodyswerve them too if you dont want to be ripped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter RE: Freedom Flotilla &#8211; David Martin by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter to Representatives RE Attack on Freedom Flotilla</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/06/05/letter-re-freedom-flotilla-david-martin/comment-page-1/#comment-5093</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter to Representatives RE Attack on Freedom Flotilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=709#comment-5093</guid>
		<description>[...] : Alyn Smith (SNP), David Martin (Labour), Catherine Stihler (Labour), Ian Hudghton (SNP), Struan Stevenson (Conservative), George [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : Alyn Smith (SNP), David Martin (Labour), Catherine Stihler (Labour), Ian Hudghton (SNP), Struan Stevenson (Conservative), George [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter RE: Freedom Flotilla &#8211; Jim McGovern by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter to Representatives RE Attack on Freedom Flotilla</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/06/05/letter-re-freedom-flotilla-jim-mcgovern/comment-page-1/#comment-5092</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter to Representatives RE Attack on Freedom Flotilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=705#comment-5092</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim McGovern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim McGovern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter to Representatives RE Attack on Freedom Flotilla by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter RE: Freedom Flotilla David Martin</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/06/05/letter-to-representatives-re-attack-on-freedom-flotilla/comment-page-1/#comment-5091</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter RE: Freedom Flotilla David Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=702#comment-5091</guid>
		<description>[...] Reply to Freedom Flotilla letter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reply to Freedom Flotilla letter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letter to Representatives RE Attack on Freedom Flotilla by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter RE: Freedom Flotilla &#8211; Jim McGovern</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/06/05/letter-to-representatives-re-attack-on-freedom-flotilla/comment-page-1/#comment-5090</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letter RE: Freedom Flotilla &#8211; Jim McGovern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=702#comment-5090</guid>
		<description>[...] Reply to Freedom Flotilla letter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reply to Freedom Flotilla letter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Rank SEO Company</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-5089</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Rank SEO Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-5089</guid>
		<description>[...] Having dealt with this sort of thing before she responded that this sort of claim was a scam and that her site was already on the front page of Google. Additionally companies claiming to be Google were scammers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having dealt with this sort of thing before she responded that this sort of claim was a scam and that her site was already on the front page of Google. Additionally companies claiming to be Google were scammers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First Search Consultancy send in the lawyers</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4924</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First Search Consultancy send in the lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4924</guid>
		<description>[...] SEO company previously discussed here with a dubious reputation has sent in the lawyers against someone who posted about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEO company previously discussed here with a dubious reputation has sent in the lawyers against someone who posted about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developer Day Scotland Agenda Announced by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Developer Day Scotland #DDDScot</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/02/26/developer-day-scotland-agenda-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-4853</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Developer Day Scotland #DDDScot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=610#comment-4853</guid>
		<description>[...] I attended the Developer Day Scotland for the second time at the weekend (I had to miss first one, can&#8217;t remember why). My sessions did vary a bit from what I had originally intended. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I attended the Developer Day Scotland for the second time at the weekend (I had to miss first one, can&#8217;t remember why). My sessions did vary a bit from what I had originally intended. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Alastair McDermott</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>We have a client who had the pleasure of dealing with these guys. We&#039;ve recently had to change their FTP passwords, completely unrelated and not due to any threats of taking down the clients site, of course! 

I think I&#039;ll have to link to Ryan and Alan&#039;s posts with the relevant keywords.

Cheers,
Alastair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a client who had the pleasure of dealing with these guys. We&#8217;ve recently had to change their FTP passwords, completely unrelated and not due to any threats of taking down the clients site, of course! </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll have to link to Ryan and Alan&#8217;s posts with the relevant keywords.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Alastair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First Search Consultancy</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4655</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First Search Consultancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4655</guid>
		<description>[...] was recently contacted by someone else who had received legal threats from First Search Consultancy. They have since edited and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was recently contacted by someone else who had received legal threats from First Search Consultancy. They have since edited and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Economy Bill by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/04/15/digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=637#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>Over the weekend I was clearing through some old letters etc and found some previous correspondance with my MP. It was over the DTI commissioning some company to make a website which had really appalling accessibility problems. He replied saying he had forwarded my concerns on to the relevent people and get back to me with their response. In the letter he used the phrase &quot;I wouldn&#039;t really call myself a technophobe, but...&quot; so it&#039;s probably for the best he isn&#039;t voting on these kinds of issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend I was clearing through some old letters etc and found some previous correspondance with my MP. It was over the DTI commissioning some company to make a website which had really appalling accessibility problems. He replied saying he had forwarded my concerns on to the relevent people and get back to me with their response. In the letter he used the phrase &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t really call myself a technophobe, but&#8230;&#8221; so it&#8217;s probably for the best he isn&#8217;t voting on these kinds of issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Economy Bill by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/04/15/digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=637#comment-4653</guid>
		<description>My MP also voted for this bill, despite not being at the second reading. I had quite a long back and forth e-mail and letter conversation with him about the pros and cons and pleaded with him not to allow it to be rushed through, but he went against constituent wishes and voted yes anyway.

Full list: http://www.theyworkforthebpi.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My MP also voted for this bill, despite not being at the second reading. I had quite a long back and forth e-mail and letter conversation with him about the pros and cons and pleaded with him not to allow it to be rushed through, but he went against constituent wishes and voted yes anyway.</p>
<p>Full list: <a href="http://www.theyworkforthebpi.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theyworkforthebpi.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>I also recieved a legal threat after posting about this company, I&#039;m currently rewriting the post to avoid any possibility of legal issues whilst maintaining the same message. Check out my post for info.

They are rather odd, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also recieved a legal threat after posting about this company, I&#8217;m currently rewriting the post to avoid any possibility of legal issues whilst maintaining the same message. Check out my post for info.</p>
<p>They are rather odd, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Economy Bill by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dundee West voters choice</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/04/15/digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-4598</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dundee West voters choice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=637#comment-4598</guid>
		<description>[...] in the West End so should he win there should be a by-election in the ward in the near future. I wrote to him 2 days ago about the Digital Economy Bill and have yet to have a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the West End so should he win there should be a by-election in the ward in the near future. I wrote to him 2 days ago about the Digital Economy Bill and have yet to have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by ROY JAMES</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4590</link>
		<dc:creator>ROY JAMES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4590</guid>
		<description>I must be mad to have agreed to use them for a second year, only doing so after they demonstrated that they had got us a natural listing on one page. I was pressured into an agreement after they showed a scam site for another SEO company. Despite many unanswered calls, emails and a threat of legal action today 16.04.10 still no response. When first contacted they represented themselves as representing Google, clearly an absolute con and waste of money. I intend to investigate legal action. Any help appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be mad to have agreed to use them for a second year, only doing so after they demonstrated that they had got us a natural listing on one page. I was pressured into an agreement after they showed a scam site for another SEO company. Despite many unanswered calls, emails and a threat of legal action today 16.04.10 still no response. When first contacted they represented themselves as representing Google, clearly an absolute con and waste of money. I intend to investigate legal action. Any help appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by julian</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4359</link>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4359</guid>
		<description>Hi, I was harassed by First Search and Steve Lyons for around 2 weeks and fortunately recorded some of the calls.. I was promised 1st page listings on GOOGLE for 7 key phrases and paid £290.00. I currently stop at page 20 and cant find my &#039;Splash Page&#039; anywhere. Take my advice and record the telephone conversations so then you have the evidence to support my comments. WHAT A RIP OFF, IT&#039;S A JOKE...!!!! If I had more time I would take legal action.... A total waste of money and what they produced for me could have been done by a High School teenager with minimal knowledge of web design and probably have cost me £20......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I was harassed by First Search and Steve Lyons for around 2 weeks and fortunately recorded some of the calls.. I was promised 1st page listings on GOOGLE for 7 key phrases and paid £290.00. I currently stop at page 20 and cant find my &#8216;Splash Page&#8217; anywhere. Take my advice and record the telephone conversations so then you have the evidence to support my comments. WHAT A RIP OFF, IT&#8217;S A JOKE&#8230;!!!! If I had more time I would take legal action&#8230;. A total waste of money and what they produced for me could have been done by a High School teenager with minimal knowledge of web design and probably have cost me £20&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>Hi Roy,

If you haven&#039;t seen it already the blog I linked to have removed their post due to legal threats. Another blog is collectings stories of people scammed by FSC adn other similar companies

http://www.ronanobrien.info/selling-first-place-on-google-scam/

You are not alone in being pestered by them. Share your story there too to help centralise a list of their operations.

Cheers,
Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roy,</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it already the blog I linked to have removed their post due to legal threats. Another blog is collectings stories of people scammed by FSC adn other similar companies</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ronanobrien.info/selling-first-place-on-google-scam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ronanobrien.info/selling-first-place-on-google-scam/</a></p>
<p>You are not alone in being pestered by them. Share your story there too to help centralise a list of their operations.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by ROY JAMES</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-4348</link>
		<dc:creator>ROY JAMES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-4348</guid>
		<description>Have been prstered by this company and unfortunately appear to having fallen foul of their sales patter. My company is only just over a year old and is obviously keen to gain market share. Have also been using Lavora Marketing who have got me firsy page adword space on Google at some expense. Being a semi retired Chartered Surveyor with no experience of such things I guess I was a soft touch. First Choice originally approached under the disguise of being Google. Any comments would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have been prstered by this company and unfortunately appear to having fallen foul of their sales patter. My company is only just over a year old and is obviously keen to gain market share. Have also been using Lavora Marketing who have got me firsy page adword space on Google at some expense. Being a semi retired Chartered Surveyor with no experience of such things I guess I was a soft touch. First Choice originally approached under the disguise of being Google. Any comments would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackwood vodka by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vodka Breaking News!</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/07/27/blackwood-vodka/comment-page-1/#comment-3959</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vodka Breaking News!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=461#comment-3959</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning I was digging through old posts, spotting errors etc when I noticed one about Blackwoods going into administration. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This morning I was digging through old posts, spotting errors etc when I noticed one about Blackwoods going into administration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack of the virgins from mums basement by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/02/14/attack-of-the-virgins-from-mums-basement/comment-page-1/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=606#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>No problem. I am ashamed that we have to. It is important for both women and men involved in the IT industry to stand up against these kind of sexist attitudes. We just have to hope that they were a tiny minority who shouted loudly on one afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem. I am ashamed that we have to. It is important for both women and men involved in the IT industry to stand up against these kind of sexist attitudes. We just have to hope that they were a tiny minority who shouted loudly on one afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack of the virgins from mums basement by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/02/14/attack-of-the-virgins-from-mums-basement/comment-page-1/#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=606#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>Thank you for writing about this issue and highlighting it as a problem that needs to be addressed. Much appreciated. ~ Sarah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for writing about this issue and highlighting it as a problem that needs to be addressed. Much appreciated. ~ Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy send in the lawyers by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/01/21/first-search-consultancy-send-in-the-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=579#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>What amuses me most about these people is how they manage to have damaging things about them still appear on the first page of search results.

Surely if they could engineer that not happening as well as good phrases for them appearing high up, i.e. &quot;SEO services&quot; and not &quot;SEO Services X Town&quot; they might be able to show that they can do what they claim to be able to do for clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amuses me most about these people is how they manage to have damaging things about them still appear on the first page of search results.</p>
<p>Surely if they could engineer that not happening as well as good phrases for them appearing high up, i.e. &#8220;SEO services&#8221; and not &#8220;SEO Services X Town&#8221; they might be able to show that they can do what they claim to be able to do for clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy send in the lawyers by Tom</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2010/01/21/first-search-consultancy-send-in-the-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-3498</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=579#comment-3498</guid>
		<description>Mike Lancaster was the same with me on the phone. He tried to intimidate me by suggesting what people had written was slanderous. Someone needs to teach him the difference between slander and lible for starters. The fact of the matter is that none of these complainants have any interest other than getting back the money which was payed in good will for a service which was consequently not received. I am sure that if those who feel that they have been ripped off by Storm Media (or one of its other names) should be able to gather evidence by accessing their Google Analytics account. This should show whether the service they have received is as it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Lancaster was the same with me on the phone. He tried to intimidate me by suggesting what people had written was slanderous. Someone needs to teach him the difference between slander and lible for starters. The fact of the matter is that none of these complainants have any interest other than getting back the money which was payed in good will for a service which was consequently not received. I am sure that if those who feel that they have been ripped off by Storm Media (or one of its other names) should be able to gather evidence by accessing their Google Analytics account. This should show whether the service they have received is as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random website sham again? by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/10/07/random-website-sham-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=534#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>No idea, they are Wigan based if that rules them in/out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea, they are Wigan based if that rules them in/out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random website sham again? by Alex</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/10/07/random-website-sham-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=534#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not being run by Brad Sutherland is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not being run by Brad Sutherland is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three quarters through the year! by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/09/30/three-quarters-through-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=514#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>Is that you top of queue for jag when it comes out? My parents had it but recovered a bit quicker than expected</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that you top of queue for jag when it comes out? My parents had it but recovered a bit quicker than expected</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three quarters through the year! by Eddie Truman</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/09/30/three-quarters-through-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Truman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=514#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>I survived Swine Flu, it was murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I survived Swine Flu, it was murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blackwood vodka by mixed drink glasses</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/07/27/blackwood-vodka/comment-page-1/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>mixed drink glasses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=461#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>Great post - thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Come in 1999 your time is up by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/08/18/come-in-1999-your-time-is-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=494#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>I managed to pick up a Space Crusade copy on ebay a while back but it was without figures and I never got round to doing a proper inventory. Hopefully Alan 2s proposed nerd nights in start and we can kick off some retro fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I managed to pick up a Space Crusade copy on ebay a while back but it was without figures and I never got round to doing a proper inventory. Hopefully Alan 2s proposed nerd nights in start and we can kick off some retro fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Come in 1999 your time is up by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/08/18/come-in-1999-your-time-is-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=494#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>That looks pretty awesome1 I&#039;ve never seen Space Hulk before but I have heard of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks pretty awesome1 I&#8217;ve never seen Space Hulk before but I have heard of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Winner is Me! 3 by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Winner is Me! 2</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/06/10/a-winner-is-me-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Winner is Me! 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=400#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>[...] new competition is to win an International Brigader t-shirt. Edit - which I won too!    &#171; Homophobic bigots on the march again First Search Consultancy - SEO cowboys with a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new competition is to win an International Brigader t-shirt. Edit &#8211; which I won too!    &laquo; Homophobic bigots on the march again First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposition Eight by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/27/proposition-eight/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=394#comment-967</guid>
		<description>What I mean is that there are many ideas on what is the correct religious teachings etc (different branches of every religion exist) and so all of these different religions and forks in religions will have slightly different views on marriage in terms of what is in vogue or whatever that decade.

I don&#039;t think anyone can disagree with homosexual marriage without coming from a religious point of view, even if it is a semi-institutionalised religious view. I agree with you that the only disagreement comes from religious ideologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I mean is that there are many ideas on what is the correct religious teachings etc (different branches of every religion exist) and so all of these different religions and forks in religions will have slightly different views on marriage in terms of what is in vogue or whatever that decade.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone can disagree with homosexual marriage without coming from a religious point of view, even if it is a semi-institutionalised religious view. I agree with you that the only disagreement comes from religious ideologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposition Eight by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/27/proposition-eight/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=394#comment-966</guid>
		<description>It depends what you mean by religious. Human recorded history doesn&#039;t pre-date any time when there was no religion. In most countries the state and religion were tied together so saying the state authorised it is also in some ways saying the religion did.

What is certain is that the argument used by the Mormons in this case - that marriage is between a man and a woman - has not always been the case. Not long ago in the US it was between one white woman and one white man a while back it became between one white person and one non-white person (of opposite genders) then later still between two people of opposite genders of any race. Before that marriages between one man and several women were legal as were (are?) one man and one pre-teen girl.

Marriages also used to be business arrangements to tie powerful families together. Wives were also bought and sold as chattel to be the property of men. The current traditional marriage has the father of the bride giving away the bride - the wording is no accident. Up until the 70s in the UK wives could be raped by their husbands without it being defined as rape.

Changes to the laws of divorce and re-marriage etc mean that there was probably no year in the last century when the definition of marriage stayed constant in every country on Earth for a year. There is also the fact that marriage is defined differently in different countries throughout the world - and in different states in the US!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends what you mean by religious. Human recorded history doesn&#8217;t pre-date any time when there was no religion. In most countries the state and religion were tied together so saying the state authorised it is also in some ways saying the religion did.</p>
<p>What is certain is that the argument used by the Mormons in this case &#8211; that marriage is between a man and a woman &#8211; has not always been the case. Not long ago in the US it was between one white woman and one white man a while back it became between one white person and one non-white person (of opposite genders) then later still between two people of opposite genders of any race. Before that marriages between one man and several women were legal as were (are?) one man and one pre-teen girl.</p>
<p>Marriages also used to be business arrangements to tie powerful families together. Wives were also bought and sold as chattel to be the property of men. The current traditional marriage has the father of the bride giving away the bride &#8211; the wording is no accident. Up until the 70s in the UK wives could be raped by their husbands without it being defined as rape.</p>
<p>Changes to the laws of divorce and re-marriage etc mean that there was probably no year in the last century when the definition of marriage stayed constant in every country on Earth for a year. There is also the fact that marriage is defined differently in different countries throughout the world &#8211; and in different states in the US!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proposition Eight by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/27/proposition-eight/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=394#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t marriage itself a fairly religious concept, so nay opposition will have to come from religion. I know pair bonding itself isn&#039;t religious and is actually the norm even in more &#039;tribal&#039; societies etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t marriage itself a fairly religious concept, so nay opposition will have to come from religion. I know pair bonding itself isn&#8217;t religious and is actually the norm even in more &#8216;tribal&#8217; societies etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Homophobic bigots on the march again by Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crazy religious nuts</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/14/homophobic-bigots-on-the-march-again/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoville Units Unite &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crazy religious nuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=368#comment-956</guid>
		<description>[...] you seeing a common theme with homophobes, and I don&#8217;t just mean their repressed sexuality.    &#171; Check [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you seeing a common theme with homophobes, and I don&#8217;t just mean their repressed sexuality.    &laquo; Check [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Ah, forgot about that. Their explanation of it changing every 30days still isn&#039;t accurate though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, forgot about that. Their explanation of it changing every 30days still isn&#8217;t accurate though <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Search Consultancy &#8211; SEO cowboys with a different technique by ukgimp</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/18/first-search-consultancy-seo-cowboys-with-a-different-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>ukgimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=374#comment-951</guid>
		<description>The geek in me needs to mention the MAC code :-)

With respect to the MAC code there is the MAC address that is associated with the network interfaces on a PC and there is a MAC code which is like the PAC code you have with a mobile phone when you wish to change provider. You request the MAC code from your current broadband provider which your new one uses to migrate you. This does last for about 28 days before you need to request a new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The geek in me needs to mention the MAC code <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>With respect to the MAC code there is the MAC address that is associated with the network interfaces on a PC and there is a MAC code which is like the PAC code you have with a mobile phone when you wish to change provider. You request the MAC code from your current broadband provider which your new one uses to migrate you. This does last for about 28 days before you need to request a new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the right one in by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/13/let-the-right-one-in/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=364#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Yeah I checked the list of Russian Communist Party Chairs and Brezhnev stopped being leader in 1982
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_leaders_of_the_Soviet_Union

So my estimate of late 70s early 80s was about right. I will need to watch again to see the newer car.

I may have a look for the US version with the crap subtitles so we can have a laugh and drink whilst rewatching at some point.

And my god, some of those subs are awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I checked the list of Russian Communist Party Chairs and Brezhnev stopped being leader in 1982<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_leaders_of_the_Soviet_Union" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_leaders_of_the_Soviet_Union</a></p>
<p>So my estimate of late 70s early 80s was about right. I will need to watch again to see the newer car.</p>
<p>I may have a look for the US version with the crap subtitles so we can have a laugh and drink whilst rewatching at some point.</p>
<p>And my god, some of those subs are awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let the right one in by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/13/let-the-right-one-in/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=364#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Have you seen this? The subtitles are apparently way off on the US DVD:
http://iconsoffright.com/news/2009/03/let_the_wrong_subtitles_in_to.html

Apparently the film is set in 1982. The &quot;modern&quot; car I thought I saw was a Toyota Space Cruiser (looked like one, anyway), which wasn&#039;t on the market until 1983 or 1984.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen this? The subtitles are apparently way off on the US DVD:<br />
<a href="http://iconsoffright.com/news/2009/03/let_the_wrong_subtitles_in_to.html" rel="nofollow">http://iconsoffright.com/news/2009/03/let_the_wrong_subtitles_in_to.html</a></p>
<p>Apparently the film is set in 1982. The &#8220;modern&#8221; car I thought I saw was a Toyota Space Cruiser (looked like one, anyway), which wasn&#8217;t on the market until 1983 or 1984.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On your Marks, get set, go! by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/11/on-your-marks-get-set-go/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=361#comment-934</guid>
		<description>&quot;As Used on...&quot; is great. I got &quot;Belching Out The Devil&quot; in the same former entertainment emporium, but not read it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As Used on&#8230;&#8221; is great. I got &#8220;Belching Out The Devil&#8221; in the same former entertainment emporium, but not read it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inbetweeners by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/09/inbetweeners/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=358#comment-932</guid>
		<description>&lt;q&gt;so, your sister or his mum&lt;/q&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><q>so, your sister or his mum</q></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inbetweeners by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/09/inbetweeners/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 13:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=358#comment-927</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&#039;re wearing a tramps shoes?&quot;
&quot;yeah, that&#039;s a bit weird mate&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re wearing a tramps shoes?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;yeah, that&#8217;s a bit weird mate&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inbetweeners by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/09/inbetweeners/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=358#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Series 2 was indeed consistently good, though maybe a little front loaded with the jokes. Definitely much better than Skins overall!

&quot;The Lion, the Witch and the Speccy Twat Who Shat Himself&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Series 2 was indeed consistently good, though maybe a little front loaded with the jokes. Definitely much better than Skins overall!</p>
<p>&#8220;The Lion, the Witch and the Speccy Twat Who Shat Himself&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inbetweeners by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/09/inbetweeners/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=358#comment-923</guid>
		<description>that whole scene was hilarious. 
&lt;q&gt;You&#039;ve been wanting to do that for ages&lt;/q&gt;
&lt;q&gt;what?
&lt;q&gt;get his clothes off&lt;/q&gt;
&lt;q&gt;he could die&lt;/q&gt;

or whatever it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that whole scene was hilarious.<br />
<q>You&#8217;ve been wanting to do that for ages</q><br />
<q>what?<br />
<q>get his clothes off</q><br />
<q>he could die</q></p>
<p>or whatever it was.</q></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inbetweeners by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/09/inbetweeners/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=358#comment-922</guid>
		<description>The fish punch is in my youtube favourites. had me in stitches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fish punch is in my youtube favourites. had me in stitches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on La Rebla Fam &#8211; internet lawyers by Rob</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/01/la-rebla-fam-internet-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=354#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m Rob, bassist for the band. 

I just want to second everything Ben said and add my own apologies. None of us were consulted on any of this stuff and the first we heard of any of it was only a couple of days ago. If we had been consulted, we would certainly have objected. The fact that threats were made only serves to make me feel physically sick.

Once again, sincerest apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m Rob, bassist for the band. </p>
<p>I just want to second everything Ben said and add my own apologies. None of us were consulted on any of this stuff and the first we heard of any of it was only a couple of days ago. If we had been consulted, we would certainly have objected. The fact that threats were made only serves to make me feel physically sick.</p>
<p>Once again, sincerest apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on La Rebla Fam &#8211; internet lawyers by Ben</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/01/la-rebla-fam-internet-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=354#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Hi this is Ben. I&#039;m the guitarist for La Rebla Fam.

This is the first time I have seen this thread and it has upset me to no end.

I do not condone what our management has done and was not aware that they were using these sort of methods to promote our band. Im not offended by the comments as you are all entitled to your opinions and feel that this sort of spam is entitled to a full barage of insults for wasting space on the internet.

On behalf of the band I apologise that such a cheap and low handed approach to advertising was used.

I would like to thank all our fans who do support us and give us great feedback through our hard work and by legitimate means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi this is Ben. I&#8217;m the guitarist for La Rebla Fam.</p>
<p>This is the first time I have seen this thread and it has upset me to no end.</p>
<p>I do not condone what our management has done and was not aware that they were using these sort of methods to promote our band. Im not offended by the comments as you are all entitled to your opinions and feel that this sort of spam is entitled to a full barage of insults for wasting space on the internet.</p>
<p>On behalf of the band I apologise that such a cheap and low handed approach to advertising was used.</p>
<p>I would like to thank all our fans who do support us and give us great feedback through our hard work and by legitimate means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on La Rebla Fam &#8211; internet lawyers by Seems like everyones heard of La Rebla Fam, but.... - Page 3 - UndergroundScene Forums</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/05/01/la-rebla-fam-internet-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Seems like everyones heard of La Rebla Fam, but.... - Page 3 - UndergroundScene Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=354#comment-886</guid>
		<description>[...] helping the pagerank Scoville Units Unite </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] helping the pagerank Scoville Units Unite </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support an Open Source project by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/03/25/support-an-open-source-project/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=323#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Really, different OS from before or is it 64bit or anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, different OS from before or is it 64bit or anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support an Open Source project by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/03/25/support-an-open-source-project/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=323#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had trouble just getting Open Office to install on my new PC, never mind actually use it. Though it has been my Office suite of choice for a few years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had trouble just getting Open Office to install on my new PC, never mind actually use it. Though it has been my Office suite of choice for a few years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tech Talk by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/03/19/tech-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=302#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Cool, I will take I look. I had found

http://codex.wordpress.org/Update_Services

Which separated lists into ones which worked and ones which didn&#039;t seem to any more so will cross check it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I will take I look. I had found</p>
<p><a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Update_Services" rel="nofollow">http://codex.wordpress.org/Update_Services</a></p>
<p>Which separated lists into ones which worked and ones which didn&#8217;t seem to any more so will cross check it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tech Talk by Mike</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/03/19/tech-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=302#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Aye - the markup issue on my site is being addressed. Its part of my house keeping - probably being building little things here and there and never got round to fixing theme - especially in my wordpress theme! 
If you want some stuff about pinging have at the list at http://www.boydofayrshire.com/wordpress/word-press-ping-list/
and add the ping for google blogsearch onto it -it&#039;s listed in the comments. But I just saw that this post was in google already so you may have it installed just now!

Glad you enjoyed the talk.
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye &#8211; the markup issue on my site is being addressed. Its part of my house keeping &#8211; probably being building little things here and there and never got round to fixing theme &#8211; especially in my wordpress theme!<br />
If you want some stuff about pinging have at the list at <a href="http://www.boydofayrshire.com/wordpress/word-press-ping-list/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boydofayrshire.com/wordpress/word-press-ping-list/</a><br />
and add the ping for google blogsearch onto it -it&#8217;s listed in the comments. But I just saw that this post was in google already so you may have it installed just now!</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed the talk.<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Meal of it by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/22/making-a-meal-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=230#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Korma, Vindaloo, I have the flour here to make naan so definitely naan, poppadoms if I can find a recipe. We also love Mexican so enchiladas and tortillas are high on list of things to make. I figure breadmaker will make the dough part of it easy enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Korma, Vindaloo, I have the flour here to make naan so definitely naan, poppadoms if I can find a recipe. We also love Mexican so enchiladas and tortillas are high on list of things to make. I figure breadmaker will make the dough part of it easy enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Meal of it by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/22/making-a-meal-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=230#comment-41</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve had Parsee red curry, Pistachio Chicken Korma and tonight Lynn made the Goan vegetable curry. Not been disappointed by any of the recipes so far and we&#039;re gonna try at least one every month. Which ones you guys gonna try? We&#039;re thinking about trying some of the desserts too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had Parsee red curry, Pistachio Chicken Korma and tonight Lynn made the Goan vegetable curry. Not been disappointed by any of the recipes so far and we&#8217;re gonna try at least one every month. Which ones you guys gonna try? We&#8217;re thinking about trying some of the desserts too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Meal of it by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/22/making-a-meal-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=230#comment-40</guid>
		<description>yeah, definitely that book, although I think a different edition of it. What have you tried from it?

We just went through marking pages of things to make and tomorrow will decide what to make in next couple of weeks and mark ingredients for shopping list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, definitely that book, although I think a different edition of it. What have you tried from it?</p>
<p>We just went through marking pages of things to make and tomorrow will decide what to make in next couple of weeks and mark ingredients for shopping list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Meal of it by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/22/making-a-meal-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=230#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Cheers, I&#039;ll need to check but I think that&#039;s the book I got, cheap in the works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers, I&#8217;ll need to check but I think that&#8217;s the book I got, cheap in the works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Meal of it by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/22/making-a-meal-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=230#comment-38</guid>
		<description>We have a recipe book of 50 great curries from india - http://www.amazon.com/Great-Curries-India-Tenth-Anniversary/dp/1904920357

If you want I can copy out some recipes we have tried? Parsee red curry was amazing as was the chicken pistachio korma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a recipe book of 50 great curries from india &#8211; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Great-Curries-India-Tenth-Anniversary/dp/1904920357" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Great-Curries-India-Tenth-Anniversary/dp/1904920357</a></p>
<p>If you want I can copy out some recipes we have tried? Parsee red curry was amazing as was the chicken pistachio korma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skins in Not Being Shit Shocker! by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/13/skins-in-not-being-shit-shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=196#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I thought the first one was great, The second series was downloaded by Lynn and she didn&#039;t like it so I&#039;ve not been motivated to watch it unfortunately. Not watched the new series properly because I wqas put off by the new cast. What I seen of the first episode put me right off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the first one was great, The second series was downloaded by Lynn and she didn&#8217;t like it so I&#8217;ve not been motivated to watch it unfortunately. Not watched the new series properly because I wqas put off by the new cast. What I seen of the first episode put me right off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skins in Not Being Shit Shocker! by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/13/skins-in-not-being-shit-shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=196#comment-29</guid>
		<description>What did you think of the previous episodes and previous series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did you think of the previous episodes and previous series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skins in Not Being Shit Shocker! by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/02/13/skins-in-not-being-shit-shocker/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=196#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I was surprised to find that I actually enjoyed this episode!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised to find that I actually enjoyed this episode!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Old Fashioned by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/01/26/old-fashioned/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=172#comment-25</guid>
		<description>The Orbea, was cheapest with pretty similar parts to the rest and was immediately available in our sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Orbea, was cheapest with pretty similar parts to the rest and was immediately available in our sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Old Fashioned by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/01/26/old-fashioned/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=172#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Which bike did you get in the end?

Oh, and technically i&#039;m pre-teen. I&#039;m not using &quot;Just Dance&quot; as my ringtone (yet...) but i do use a Laeto song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which bike did you get in the end?</p>
<p>Oh, and technically i&#8217;m pre-teen. I&#8217;m not using &#8220;Just Dance&#8221; as my ringtone (yet&#8230;) but i do use a Laeto song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Old Fashioned by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/01/26/old-fashioned/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=172#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I would be in your age group too if I had my way, not found a good &quot;ring&quot; yet though. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be in your age group too if I had my way, not found a good &#8220;ring&#8221; yet though. <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So Long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, Goodbye by Angie</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2009/01/20/so-long-farewell-auf-wiedersehen-goodbye/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=157#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Bwahahahaha amen to that! :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahahahaha amen to that! <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frightened Rabbit at Fat Sams by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/12/11/frightened-rabbit-at-fat-sams/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=93#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember if I had or not, possibly. It&#039;s good all the same. The live &quot;acoustic&quot; album is decent, you can listen to it on the Fat Cat website, which i think is www.fat-cat.co.uk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember if I had or not, possibly. It&#8217;s good all the same. The live &#8220;acoustic&#8221; album is decent, you can listen to it on the Fat Cat website, which i think is <a href="http://www.fat-cat.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.fat-cat.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frightened Rabbit at Fat Sams by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/12/11/frightened-rabbit-at-fat-sams/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=93#comment-11</guid>
		<description>the sound was alright where we were standing, not great but it was more:

vocals &gt;&gt;&gt; drums &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; guitar &gt;&gt;&gt; bass/keyboard &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; rhythm

Spent this morning listening to the first album. You must have let me hear it before as 2 tracks were played last night and I knew the words to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the sound was alright where we were standing, not great but it was more:</p>
<p>vocals >>> drums >>>>>>>> guitar >>> bass/keyboard >>>>>>>>>>> rhythm</p>
<p>Spent this morning listening to the first album. You must have let me hear it before as 2 tracks were played last night and I knew the words to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frightened Rabbit at Fat Sams by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/12/11/frightened-rabbit-at-fat-sams/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=93#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I thought FR were really good last night, but they need to sack their soundman. That&#039;s the second time i&#039;ve seen them and the second time the sound has really let them down.

Last night it seemed to be:

drums &gt;&gt;&gt; vocals &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; guitars &gt;&gt;&gt; bass/keyboard

But aye, they are a really good band, just wish they&#039;d play in a better venue or get someone else to do their sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought FR were really good last night, but they need to sack their soundman. That&#8217;s the second time i&#8217;ve seen them and the second time the sound has really let them down.</p>
<p>Last night it seemed to be:</p>
<p>drums &gt;&gt;&gt; vocals &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; guitars &gt;&gt;&gt; bass/keyboard</p>
<p>But aye, they are a really good band, just wish they&#8217;d play in a better venue or get someone else to do their sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: UGS by Alan G</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/11/25/link-ugs/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=63#comment-7</guid>
		<description>admit it, the real reason was the bandwidth bill for the thread about the holy citadel of Abergatvanistan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>admit it, the real reason was the bandwidth bill for the thread about the holy citadel of Abergatvanistan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: UGS by Col</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/11/25/link-ugs/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Col</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=63#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Oi! I think you&#039;ll find the Kerosene Board died because I felt everyone else was getting younger :p 

That and the Kerosene Community Forums were just becoming a comedy goldmine rather than a proper music forum.

Wish I&#039;d kept it going now just for the comedy value, but now I really am too old! :D

Col (aka DJ Col) (akaka Old Fart)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oi! I think you&#8217;ll find the Kerosene Board died because I felt everyone else was getting younger :p </p>
<p>That and the Kerosene Community Forums were just becoming a comedy goldmine rather than a proper music forum.</p>
<p>Wish I&#8217;d kept it going now just for the comedy value, but now I really am too old! <img src='http://agraham.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Col (aka DJ Col) (akaka Old Fart)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: UGS by KJ</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/11/25/link-ugs/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=63#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hey man, glad to see you got your blog up and running, and thanks for the shout out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man, glad to see you got your blog up and running, and thanks for the shout out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vodka Reviews by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/11/09/vodka-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=31#comment-4</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called Koskenkorva.

http://www.koskenkorva.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koskenkorva_Viina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called Koskenkorva.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.koskenkorva.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.koskenkorva.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koskenkorva_Viina" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koskenkorva_Viina</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vodka Reviews by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/11/09/vodka-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=31#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I have another Finnish vodka for you to try, but can&#039;t remember the name of it right now. It&#039;s apparently award winning. Will bring it round at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have another Finnish vodka for you to try, but can&#8217;t remember the name of it right now. It&#8217;s apparently award winning. Will bring it round at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: Swearing in a Foreign Language by Michael</title>
		<link>http://agraham.org/blog/2008/09/23/link-swearing-in-a-foreign-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agraham.org/blog/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure the best way to ensure that my blog doesn&#039;t suck is to continue my run of not posting in it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the best way to ensure that my blog doesn&#8217;t suck is to continue my run of not posting in it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

